More limits for land ownership

In P.E.I. it would serve us much better if there was a land limit of 1,000 acres of land per individual and 3,000 acres for a corporation that has three shareholders.

Since I was a kid, government after government has let an oil company and other large entities come up with any excuse to buy land beyond what was supposed to be the legal limits. The latest excuse for circumventing the law is they claim they need 350 acres for research.

They must be really lousy farmers if they need 350 more acres just for research. Real farmers that know what they are doing are always observing, taking notes and trying new ways to create produce on their farms … we do it a lot.

P.E.I. is Canada’s food insecure island now. We have the highest food insecurity rate for children in Canada…

I have four kids that are either farming or potentially could …we need more land. I could only buy a few scraps of land. The big industry players get to circumvent the law, enabled by our incompetent governments. It does not sit well for our food security.

Ranald MacFarlane,

Metro Fernwood, P.E.I.

Share On Social Media

About the site

Stay up-to-date on Coalition activites here.

Find us

Address

81 Prince Street

Charlottetown, PE

c1A 4R3

Related Posts

UPCOMING FORUM

https://www.peicanada.com/island_farmer/silencing-of-the-land-topic-for-coalition-forum/article_377a8576-c754-11ee-b125-eb0a0b7d3ad0.html#tncms-source=block-contextual

Read More »

Thanks to Chris Ortenburger for sharing this article in her Citizens’ Alliance newsletter this morning, along with these comments: “There is so much in that interview that brings up more questions for the Minister and Premier: must all land be in “production”? where is good Land Use Planning? (notice that may not be the same as Where is the Land Use Plan? ;-) where is the IRAC report on the Kings County land holdings that former Environment and former Lands and Community minister Stephen Myers set in motion? Why can’t the Land Department keep track of land? Why have IRAC in charge of this when her government has announced it is set to break up IRAC and there will certainly be a lot of transition? And things not addressed here: What about non-profit land protection organizations like Island Nature Trust? (this has been addressed elsewhere with a wave of the hand, but it would be good if the minister recognised this clearly) Why are agriculture giants not addressed, but non-profits? How easy will it be to work around this law? Have they thought that far in the future? This also feels like a use of *a lot* of government legislative writing time that could be spent on other promised legislation

Thanks to Chris Ortenburger for sharing this article in her Citizens’ Alliance newsletter this morning, along with these comments: “There is so much in that

Read More »